Tooronga Action Group >>>

TAG's Flood Management Submission to Panel Hearing—August 2006

Boroondara Planning Scheme Amendment C70, Tooronga Village

Presented by David Williams

Aim

The purpose of this submission is to alert the Panel to the background and possible effects of flooding at the proposed Stockland development at the site known as Tooronga Village and the subject of the Tooronga Planning Scheme Amendment C 70.

References

  1. Water Technology—Flood Investigations
    Tooronga Village Development May 2006—Stephen Clark for Stockland
  2. G.H.D.—Expert Witness Statement on Floodplain at Tooronga Village—George Mallory June 2006 for City of Boroondara
  3. David Fairbairn—Report on Flood Management Issues—for Snipe Investments July 2006.

Background

Subject to Inundation or Flood Prone
This is a brief history of the flood prone areas of Gardiners Creek in the stretch of creek between Burke Rd downstream to Tooronga Rd. The notes provide a possible story of flooding on the proposed Stockland development at Tooronga and on the surrounding residential area.

Flooding

Calculation of loss of off-stream storage at approx. 80 megalitres

  1. Coles Myer land (brickworks site)—Approx. 100m X 100m X 2m of dumped material from building of freeway = 20,000m3 = 20 megalitres
  2. Council owned land (between Coles Myer land and former Tooronga Bowling Club)—Approx. 40m X 80m X 0.5m of dumped material from building freeway =1600m3 = 1.6 megalitres
  3. Building of Monash Freeway/overpass—Approx.150m X 400m X 1m =60,000m3 =60 megalitres

Water Technology Report

Note that this report was commissioned by Stockland and contains two options:

  1. Rix Street—Drain to a possible wetland on council land to the east of the development
  2. Realignment and improvement to the existing drain within the development site.

Both these options cause no significant change to the present flood prone land. The draw back to option (1) is that the Council and the community have to partially surrender the use of public open space to accommodate off stream storage to benefit the developer. TAG, therefore, does not support option (1).

G.H.D. Report

The G.H.D. report largely agrees with the broad conclusions of the Water Technology Report. It does, however, state that without the wetland area included a rise in flood levels for the 100 year flood may occur (option (1). Both reports refer to possible widening of Gardiners Creek by Melbourne Water.

David Fairbairn Report

This report to Snipe Investments basically refers to flooding problems on the south side of the freeway in the City of Stonnington. However, it does conclude that entry conditions of water south of the creek to Gardiners Creek will rely on at least the capacity of existing sub-freeway culverts being maintained or enlarged.

The report further concludes that there is not sufficient information available to adequately assess flood management issues, particularly south of the freeway. As the whole flood plain and flooding must be considered as a single problem, further information will be required to give a considered and effective definition of flood prone areas of the Coles Myer development site.

Recommendations

  1. That a thorough and detailed flood prone study be undertaken by a Hydro-Engineering firm in conjunction with Melbourne Water.
  2. The study should consider flooding on both sides of Gardiners Creek in relation to flood levels on the Stockland/Coles Myer site.
  3. The fill of excavated material from the Monash Freeway should be removed.
  4. The proposed wetlands area must remain as a flood storage option to reduce overall flooding in the area. It should not be a flood storage option in relation to the Stockland development.
  5. A Development Plan is a mandatory requirement within the Planning Scheme. The necessity for the developer of the brickworks site to provide for on-site flood water storage will render the Indicative Concept Plan of little probative value.

^ top of page